Southern California Contractors Association
 
  MENU
  Home
  Contact us
  What we do
  Events & Meetings
  Industry Resources
  Safety Resources

  SCCA Magazine
  JULY-AUG 2011 Issue
  MAY-JUNE 2011 Issue
  MAR-APR 2011 Issue
  JAN-FEB 2011 Issue
  2010 ISSUES
  Editorial Calendar
  Insertion Order
  Contact Us

 
Reach the Southern California construction industry with an ad in SCCA magazine.
 
CARBCritical initiatives on November 2 ballot
As boring as it may seem initially to read the official version of what these propositions will do if passed, most of them are important enough to your business, your wallet, your industry and/or your future that they deserve a closer look so you can make an informed decision at the ballot box.  

$20.9 billion shortage in unemployment funds predicted
As California’s estimated $20 billion budget deficit looms, even more devastating to the state’s economy could be a $15.3 billion shortfall in unemployment funds predicted to occur by the end of 2010 and a $20.9 billion shortfall expected by the end of 2011.

How to meet Caltrans requirements for DBEs
You are required to maintain complete lists of outreach efforts, contacts made, follow-up efforts, bids received and assistance offered to DBEs. Here's how.
PLUS

Member Spotlight: Dalton Trucking
Dalton Trucking is a widely diverse aggregates, freight, heavy-haul and mining company.

Member Spotlight: Crane Rental Service
Crane Rental service has one of the largest crane fleets in the Western United States with 25- to 350-ton hydraulic cranes, 30-ton boom truck and 50-ton rough-terrain cranes, all of which are available on an hourly basis.

Mr. Crane places Bolsa Chica footbridge
Mr. Crane’s self-erecting Liebherr 500-ton LTM-1400 crane, with rigging, hook and block weighing approximately 76,000 pounds, was ideal for the project.

AND MORE! 

The gas tax swap and transportation funding

Big changes have come to the way California funds transportation projects. Effective July 1, the state will no longer collect sales tax on gasoline as required by Proposition 42. Instead, pursuant to legislation signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in March, the state will collect an excise tax on gasoline. That tax, called the “gas tax swap,” will be increased to match the loss the state will see from elimination of the sales tax on gasoline and frees up some funds for the state at the expense of transportation funding protections.

But before delving into a discussion of Proposition 42 and how the gas tax has changed transportation funding, we’d like to call your attention to a small victory for those that dislike the idea of the government taxing you – or in this case, taxing your taxes.

To understand this small victory, you must first understand how the state collects taxes on gasoline. The overall price at the pump is the price of the fuel plus 18.4 cents in federal excise tax plus 18 cents in state excise tax plus sales tax of 8.25 percent. The sales tax is actually levied on the state and federal excise tax. In other words, the state collects a sales tax on the tax. With passage of the gas tax swap, the state’s share of the sales tax is replaced with an increase in the state excise tax. No longer will the state tax a tax. But that only accounts for the state’s share of the sales tax. There are sales taxes for other programs:

• 0.50 percent to the Local Revenue Account for city and county mental health, social service and health programs.
• 0.25 percent to pay the principal, interest and premium of the Fiscal Recovery Bonds of 2003.
• 0.50 percent for local police and sheriff departments.
• 1.0 percent for California’s 58 counties.
• 1.0 percent for so-called self-help counties that agree to increase their sales tax by 1.0 percent and dedicate the revenue to transportation funding.

The new state excise tax
July 1, the new state excise tax on gasoline increased by $0.173 to $0.353 per gallon with a federal excise tax of $0.184 and up to 3.25 percent for specific programs. This is very important to transportation funding and I can give you 3.4 billion reasons why. Proposition 42 brings in about $3.4 billion annually to transportation and transit capital funding. In 2002, SCCA strongly supported passage of Proposition 42, which requires the sales tax on motor fuels be dedicated to specific transportation funding.

In 2006, SCCA supported passage of Proposition 1A. After several years of having Sacramento siphon off Prop 42 funding and with massive pressure by the construction industry, the legislature placed Prop 1A on the ballot, limiting the times legislature could take Prop 42 funding to twice in 10 years and requiring repayment within three years. Prop 1A passed with 76.6 percent approval.

In 2010, the legislature decided if the state eliminated sales tax on motor fuels, it could completely bypass both Prop 42 and Prop 1A. With the state facing a deficit of $20 billion from early 2010 to mid 2011, the legislature passed the gas tax swap. The legislature didn’t dump all the money into the state’s General Fund. Under Prop 42, the revenue was to be allocated 20 percent to public transportation, 40 percent to transportation improvement projects and 40 percent to local streets and highways.

The gas tax swap uses a similar formula: 30 percent to transportation improvement projects, 30 percent to highway maintenance and 40 percent to local streets and highways. However, the formula only applies after the state pays the debt service on several transportation related bonds, including Prop 1B.

Why did the legislature propose this? With the gas tax swap paying the debt service, the general fund savings in 2011 will be $727 million. If the state is saving $727 million, is transportation funding losing that amount? No. There is now a dedicated revenue stream to the debt service. It will be less expensive for the state to sell transportation bonds to raise more funding for transportation.

And Prop 1B authorized up to $20 billion in bonds. So far, the state has only sold $4.5 billion in bonds. Add the gas tax swap, and that $15.5 billion is no longer a general obligation bond, but a revenue bond. The gas tax swap should be revenue neutral, but the change in the revenue allocation formula should provide for sale of additional bonds for continued transportation funding.

Todd Bloomstine is a California registered lobbyist. He has represented SCCA since 2001.
 
 
 
  Southern California Contractors Association

Copyright 2011 by Southern California Contractors Association. All rights reserved.